Better late than never.
Week 6 Upsets: BAL, ATL, MIA, OAK, GB. Last week, NFLSim went 3-2 with upsets, so let's see how it does this week.
BAL at IND -5, 39
Winner: BAL, 58%
Spread: BAL +5, 72%
O/U: OVER, 51%
CAR at TB -1, 36.5
Winner: TB, 58%
Spread: TB -1, 56%
O/U: OVER, 69%
CHI -3 at ATL, 43.5
Winner: ATL, 57%
Spread: ATL +3, 67%
O/U: OVER, 58%
CIN at NYJ -6, 44.5
Winner: NYJ, 65%
Spread: CIN +6, 51%
O/U: OVER, 56%
DET at MIN -14, 45.5
Winner: MIN, 79%
Spread: DET +14, 61%
O/U: OVER, 59%
MIA at HOU -3, 44.5
Winner: MIA, 51%
Spread: MIA +3, 66%
O/U: OVER, 70%
OAK at NO -7.5, 47
Winner: OAK, 55%
Spread: OAK +7.5, 80%
O/U: UNDER, 57%
STL at WAS -13.5, 44.5
Winner: WAS, 76%
Spread: STL +13.5, 63%
O/U: OVER, 54%
JAX at DEN -3.5, 48
Winner: DEN, 75%
Spread: DEN -3.5, 63%
O/U: OVER, 57%
DAL -6 at ARI, 50
Winner: DAL, 51%
Spread: ARI +6, 70%
O/U: UNDER, 54%
GB at SEA -3, 47
Winner: GB, 54%
Spread: GB +3, 60%
O/U: OVER, 57%
PHI -5 at SF, 43
Winner: PHI, 59%
Spread: SF +5, 52%
O/U: OVER, 58%
NE at SD -6, 45
Winner: SD, 60%
Spread: NE +6, 59%
O/U: OVER, 72%
NYG -8 at CLE, 43
Winner: NYG, 76%
Spread: NYG -8, 51%
O/U: OVER, 55%
Showing posts with label Betting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Betting. Show all posts
Friday, October 10, 2008
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
Week 5: Results
I'm happy with this week's performance. Picked 9 out of 14, beat Accuscore's 8 of 14. Also, out of the 5 underdogs NFLSim picked to win, 3 of them won (ATL, 3.5 pt dog; PIT, 4; MIN, 3).
Tie is Blue
SEA at NYG -7, 43.5
Winner: NYG, 70%
Spread: SEA +7, 56%
O/U: UNDER, 55%
WAS at PHI -6, 42.5
Winner: PHI, 73%
Spread: PHI -6, 51%
O/U: UNDER, 56%
SD -6.5 at MIA, 44.5
Winner: SD, 54%
Spread: MIA +6.5, 67%
O/U: OVER, 72%
KC at CAR -9.5, 38.5
Winner: CAR, 61%
Spread: KC +9.5, 68%
O/U: UNDER, 54%
TEN -3 at BAL, 33
Winner: TEN, 51%
Spread: BAL +3, 62%
O/U: OVER, 55%
IND -3.5 at HOU, 47
Winner: HOU, 63%
Spread: HOU +3.5, 68%
O/U: OVER, 56%
CHI -3.5 at DET, 44.5
Winner: CHI, 73%
Spread: CHI -3.5, 64%
O/U: OVER, 57%
ATL at GB -3.5, 41
Winner: ATL, 67%
Spread: ATL +3.5, 74%
O/U: OVER, 64%
TB at DEN -3, 47.5
Winner: DEN, 55%
Spread: TB +3, 55%
O/U: OVER, 56%
CIN at DAL -17, 44
Winner: DAL, 73%
Spread: CIN +17, 72%
O/U: OVER, 51%
BUF at ARI EVEN, 44.5
Winner: BUF, 74%
Spread: ---
O/U: OVER, 51%
NE -3.5 at SF, 41
Winner: SF, 54%
Spread: SF +3.5, 67%
O/U: UNDER, 51%
PIT at JAX -4, 36
Winner: PIT, 61%
Spread: PIT +4, 72%
O/U: OVER, 62%
MIN at NO -3, 46.5
Winner: MIN, 52%
Spread: MIN +3, 60%
O/U: UNDER, 58%
Tie is Blue
SEA at NYG -7, 43.5
Winner: NYG, 70%
Spread: SEA +7, 56%
O/U: UNDER, 55%
WAS at PHI -6, 42.5
Winner: PHI, 73%
Spread: PHI -6, 51%
O/U: UNDER, 56%
SD -6.5 at MIA, 44.5
Winner: SD, 54%
Spread: MIA +6.5, 67%
O/U: OVER, 72%
KC at CAR -9.5, 38.5
Winner: CAR, 61%
Spread: KC +9.5, 68%
O/U: UNDER, 54%
TEN -3 at BAL, 33
Winner: TEN, 51%
Spread: BAL +3, 62%
O/U: OVER, 55%
IND -3.5 at HOU, 47
Winner: HOU, 63%
Spread: HOU +3.5, 68%
O/U: OVER, 56%
CHI -3.5 at DET, 44.5
Winner: CHI, 73%
Spread: CHI -3.5, 64%
O/U: OVER, 57%
ATL at GB -3.5, 41
Winner: ATL, 67%
Spread: ATL +3.5, 74%
O/U: OVER, 64%
TB at DEN -3, 47.5
Winner: DEN, 55%
Spread: TB +3, 55%
O/U: OVER, 56%
CIN at DAL -17, 44
Winner: DAL, 73%
Spread: CIN +17, 72%
O/U: OVER, 51%
BUF at ARI EVEN, 44.5
Winner: BUF, 74%
Spread: ---
O/U: OVER, 51%
NE -3.5 at SF, 41
Winner: SF, 54%
Spread: SF +3.5, 67%
O/U: UNDER, 51%
PIT at JAX -4, 36
Winner: PIT, 61%
Spread: PIT +4, 72%
O/U: OVER, 62%
MIN at NO -3, 46.5
Winner: MIN, 52%
Spread: MIN +3, 60%
O/U: UNDER, 58%
| Straight | % | Correct | Games | Win % |
| 50-59 | 3 | 5 | 60.0% | |
| 60-69 | 3 | 4 | 75.0% | |
| 70-79 | 3 | 5 | 60.0% | |
| 80-89 | 0 | 0 | --- | |
| 90-100 | 0 | 0 | --- | |
| Total | 9 | 14 | 64.3% | |
| Spread | % | Correct | Games | Win % |
| 50-59 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | |
| 60-69 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | |
| 70-79 | 3 | 3 | 100.0% | |
| 80-89 | 0 | 0 | --- | |
| 90-100 | 0 | 0 | --- | |
| Total | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | |
| Total | Correct | Games | Win % | |
| 50-59 | 5 | 11 | 45.5% | |
| 60-69 | 2 | 2 | 100.0% | |
| 70-79 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | |
| 80-89 | 0 | 0 | --- | |
| 90-100 | 0 | 0 | --- | |
| Total | 7 | 14 | 50.0% |
Thursday, October 2, 2008
Week 3: BOA Results
I'm going to be brief with the results this week. I've had a ton of work this week and I'm a little short on time. BOA was down 78% this week. The probability of all of those teams losing was 0.2%, nice. Watching this go up 65% week 2, down 78% week 4, it tells me that there's too much huge swings. This isn't good for a long term strategy. I'm going to work on it to figure out better risk management. Until then, I'm going to stop posting it.
Thursday, September 25, 2008
Week 4: BOA
Now, the increasingly popular Bet Optimization Algorithm (BOA). Things should be more exciting this week since there are 3 underdog picks. That means greater risk and greater rewards (or greater losses). Remember, these are all MONEYLINE bets, they are NOT ATS.
I've noticed that as the number of bets increases, the success of BOA increases, so I'll put up 30 bets this time.
1-TEN, 2-DEN, 3-SF, 4-NYJ, 5-TB, 6-ATL, 7-JAX, 8-CIN, 9-SD, 10-BUF, 11-DAL, 12-PHI, 13-BAL
I've noticed that as the number of bets increases, the success of BOA increases, so I'll put up 30 bets this time.
1-TEN, 2-DEN, 3-SF, 4-NYJ, 5-TB, 6-ATL, 7-JAX, 8-CIN, 9-SD, 10-BUF, 11-DAL, 12-PHI, 13-BAL
| BET | BOA ODDS | VEGAS PAYOUT | % of BANKROLL | PAYOUT |
| 10 | 82.00% | 1.25 | 5.73% | 7.16 |
| 8 | 78.00% | 1.53 | 5.39% | 8.25 |
| 1 | 74.00% | 1.61 | 4.90% | 7.90 |
| 6 | 65.00% | 3.70 | 4.71% | 17.42 |
| 3 | 65.00% | 3.00 | 4.52% | 13.56 |
| 8,10 | 63.96% | 1.91 | 3.82% | 7.31 |
| 6,10 | 53.30% | 4.63 | 3.66% | 16.94 |
| 6,8 | 50.70% | 5.66 | 3.56% | 20.15 |
| 1,10 | 60.68% | 2.01 | 3.49% | 7.02 |
| 3,10 | 53.30% | 3.75 | 3.46% | 12.98 |
| 1,8 | 57.72% | 2.46 | 3.44% | 8.47 |
| 3,8 | 50.70% | 4.59 | 3.39% | 15.55 |
| 2 | 67.00% | 1.21 | 3.37% | 4.07 |
| 13 | 55.00% | 2.90 | 3.35% | 9.71 |
| 1,6 | 48.10% | 5.96 | 3.34% | 19.89 |
| 1,3 | 48.10% | 4.83 | 3.17% | 15.29 |
| 3,6 | 42.25% | 11.10 | 3.14% | 34.86 |
| 6,8,10 | 41.57% | 7.08 | 2.82% | 19.98 |
| 3,8,10 | 41.57% | 5.74 | 2.66% | 15.27 |
| 1,6,10 | 39.44% | 7.45 | 2.65% | 19.76 |
| 2,6 | 43.55% | 4.48 | 2.62% | 11.74 |
| 1,6,8 | 37.52% | 9.11 | 2.60% | 23.69 |
| 1,8,10 | 47.33% | 3.08 | 2.56% | 7.89 |
| 8,13 | 42.90% | 4.44 | 2.55% | 11.29 |
| 12 | 57.00% | 1.59 | 2.54% | 4.04 |
| 10,13 | 45.10% | 3.63 | 2.54% | 9.20 |
| 3,6,10 | 34.65% | 13.88 | 2.54% | 35.21 |
| 6,13 | 35.75% | 10.73 | 2.52% | 27.07 |
| 1,3,10 | 39.44% | 6.04 | 2.49% | 15.05 |
| 1,3,8 | 37.52% | 7.39 | 2.46% | 18.21 |
Week 4: Predictions
Here are the week 4 predictions. I'm not putting out the spread picks because I don't think they're accurate enough. As soon as I see some good results, I'll put them out there. Same with the O/U picks.
Most Confident Pick: BUF over STL, 82%; followed by CIN over CLE, 78%
Upset Watch: SF over NO, 65%; ATL over CAR, 65%; BAL over PIT, 55%
MIN at TEN -3
Winner: TEN, 74%
DEN -9.5 at KC
Winner: DEN, 67%
SF at NO -6
Winner: SF, 65%
ARI at NYJ -1.5
Winner: NYJ, 54%
GB at TB -1
Winner: TB, 52%
ATL at CAR -7
Winner: ATL, 65%
HOU at JAX -7
Winner: JAX, 54%
CLE at CIN -3.5
Winner: CIN, 78%
SD -7.5 at OAK
Winner: SD, 52%
BUF -8 at STL
Winner: BUF, 82%
WAS at DAL -10.5
Winner: DAL, 60%
PHI -3 at CHI
Winner: PHI, 57%
BAL at PIT -5
Winner: BAL, 55%
Most Confident Pick: BUF over STL, 82%; followed by CIN over CLE, 78%
Upset Watch: SF over NO, 65%; ATL over CAR, 65%; BAL over PIT, 55%
MIN at TEN -3
Winner: TEN, 74%
DEN -9.5 at KC
Winner: DEN, 67%
SF at NO -6
Winner: SF, 65%
ARI at NYJ -1.5
Winner: NYJ, 54%
GB at TB -1
Winner: TB, 52%
ATL at CAR -7
Winner: ATL, 65%
HOU at JAX -7
Winner: JAX, 54%
CLE at CIN -3.5
Winner: CIN, 78%
SD -7.5 at OAK
Winner: SD, 52%
BUF -8 at STL
Winner: BUF, 82%
WAS at DAL -10.5
Winner: DAL, 60%
PHI -3 at CHI
Winner: PHI, 57%
BAL at PIT -5
Winner: BAL, 55%
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Week 3: BOA Results
Wow. Things almost couldn't have gone any better. I say this because I'm extremely pleased with how BOA performed this week. It spread out the risk while still offering a high level of reward. 7 of the 9 teams were correct. 10 of the 19 bets were correct. If only Vegas' 12.5 point favorite, my 90% favorite had beaten one of the worst teams in the league, I'd be much, much happier. So for week 3, if you started with a bankroll of $100, you would have lost $14.38, or -14.38%. I hate to play the 'what if' game, but I can't help myself this week. What if the 12.5 pt favorite, NE, had decided to beat MIA? $100 would have turned into $157.79. Fine. There's always next week.
Tracking BOA: Week 2, started with $100. Up 64.62% week 2, down 14.38% week 3.
Initial Investment: $100
Current Investment: $140.95
ROI: 40.95%
1-ATL, 2-BUF, 3-CHI, 4-MIN, 5-NE, 6-NYG, 7-TEN, 8-WAS, 9-SF, 10-SEA, 11-DEN, 12-PHI, 13-IND, 14-BAL, 15-DAL, 16-SD
Tracking BOA: Week 2, started with $100. Up 64.62% week 2, down 14.38% week 3.
Initial Investment: $100
Current Investment: $140.95
ROI: 40.95%
1-ATL, 2-BUF, 3-CHI, 4-MIN, 5-NE, 6-NYG, 7-TEN, 8-WAS, 9-SF, 10-SEA, 11-DEN, 12-PHI, 13-IND, 14-BAL, 15-DAL, 16-SD
| BET | BOA ODDS | VEGAS PAYOUT | % of BANKROLL | PAYOUT |
| 5 | 90.00% | 1.11 | 7.21% | 8.01 |
| 7 | 87.00% | 1.43 | 6.94% | 9.92 |
| 6 | 84.00% | 1.11 | 6.20% | 6.88 |
| 14 | 80.00% | 1.77 | 6.12% | 10.83 |
| 9 | 79.00% | 1.50 | 5.79% | 8.68 |
| 5,7 | 78.30% | 1.59 | 5.76% | 9.14 |
| 2 | 79.00% | 1.19 | 5.46% | 6.50 |
| 5,14 | 72.00% | 1.96 | 5.14% | 10.10 |
| 7,14 | 69.60% | 2.53 | 5.13% | 12.98 |
| 6,7 | 73.08% | 1.59 | 5.00% | 7.93 |
| 5,6 | 75.60% | 1.23 | 4.97% | 6.12 |
| 7,9 | 68.73% | 2.15 | 4.82% | 10.35 |
| 5,9 | 71.10% | 1.67 | 4.79% | 7.97 |
| 13 | 71.00% | 1.43 | 4.52% | 6.46 |
| 5,7,14 | 62.64% | 2.81 | 4.50% | 12.64 |
| 11 | 70.00% | 1.40 | 4.48% | 6.28 |
| 10 | 71.00% | 1.20 | 4.39% | 5.27 |
| 5,6,7 | 65.77% | 1.76 | 4.39% | 7.74 |
| 5,7,9 | 61.86% | 2.38 | 4.38% | 10.44 |
Friday, September 19, 2008
Week 3: BOA
Originally, I decided to put up a simplified version of BOA's results. Bad idea. I'll need to mention a few things first. I chose to leave out bets against the spread and just include moneyline bets, for now. The fundamental reason BOA works is because of inefficiencies in Vegas' line making. After simulating last season, and after extensive backtesting, NFLSim showed a remarkable tendency to assign accurate probability values for games. BOA exploits this. The only way BOA can be successful is if it assigns the correct probabilites to games, enabling for an optimal allocation of funds to different bets with different payouts. The second important point is that every bet is a different amount, based on the difference in those probabilities. Again, I don't feel that the spread predictions have reached that point yet, though I am comfortable with just striaght picking.
At some point I'd like to write up a rigorous mathematical proof showing why this works, but I'll need to meet up with my statistics professor for that.
Before using this table, consider that the season is just beginning; this is only week 3, so the simulations aren't as accurate as they will be. I can't tell you not to bet, but just keep that in mind.
Since Baltimore's win % against Cleveland is so ridiculously high (97%), I decided to run BOA using a more conservative 80%. At 97%, BAL showed up in pretty much every bet. If BAL loses, lots of bets would lose. Better safe than sorry. If you can't tell by now, I like to err on the side of conservatism.
Once more, this is what each heading means:
~"BOA ODDS" are BOA's calculated probability that the particular bet will win.
~"VEGAS PAYOUT" is the payout for that bet according to Vegas, in decimal form.
~"% OF BANKROLL" is the amount bankroll that should be devoted to that bet.
~"POSSIBLE PAYOUT" is the amount won if the bet is won. (BANKROLL * % OF BANKROLL * VEGAS PAYOUT)
Here is the team key, each number corresponds to a particular bet. 1-ATL means that when you see the number 1, it means bet on ATL to win. If you see 5,7, it means parlay NE and TEN.
1-ATL, 2-BUF, 3-CHI, 4-MIN, 5-NE, 6-NYG, 7-TEN, 8-WAS, 9-SF, 10-SEA, 11-DEN, 12-PHI, 13-IND, 14-BAL, 15-DAL, 16-SD
Alright, let's look at this. That table is based on a bankroll of $100. One of the other reasons BOA works is because it spreads risk over numerous bets in a way such that if one bet fails, other bets can still keep you afloat. If you don't feel like making 19 bets, my advice would be to scale the bets that you do make. If you only want to make the top 5 bets, for example, add the top 5 "% BANKROLLs" together. To find the new percentage to bet, divide that bet's "% BANKROLL" by the sum of the 5 "% BANKROLLs". So... 7.21+6.94+6.2+6.12+5.79 = 32.25. Bet 1 will be 7.21/32.25 = 22.36%. Bet 2 will be 6.94/32.35 = 21.51%, and so on. All 5 percentages should add up to 100%.
As you decrease the number of bets, you increase the amount of risk. For example, if you bet all 19 bets and and all teams win except 5-NE, which has a 90% confidence, you will lose 7.91% of your bankroll. If you decide to only bet the top 5 bets, you'll lose 22.36%. It's about all about your tolerance for risk, which is yours to figure out.
I hope this makes everyone happy. If not, send me someangry emails.
At some point I'd like to write up a rigorous mathematical proof showing why this works, but I'll need to meet up with my statistics professor for that.
Before using this table, consider that the season is just beginning; this is only week 3, so the simulations aren't as accurate as they will be. I can't tell you not to bet, but just keep that in mind.
Since Baltimore's win % against Cleveland is so ridiculously high (97%), I decided to run BOA using a more conservative 80%. At 97%, BAL showed up in pretty much every bet. If BAL loses, lots of bets would lose. Better safe than sorry. If you can't tell by now, I like to err on the side of conservatism.
Once more, this is what each heading means:
~"BOA ODDS" are BOA's calculated probability that the particular bet will win.
~"VEGAS PAYOUT" is the payout for that bet according to Vegas, in decimal form.
~"% OF BANKROLL" is the amount bankroll that should be devoted to that bet.
~"POSSIBLE PAYOUT" is the amount won if the bet is won. (BANKROLL * % OF BANKROLL * VEGAS PAYOUT)
Here is the team key, each number corresponds to a particular bet. 1-ATL means that when you see the number 1, it means bet on ATL to win. If you see 5,7, it means parlay NE and TEN.
1-ATL, 2-BUF, 3-CHI, 4-MIN, 5-NE, 6-NYG, 7-TEN, 8-WAS, 9-SF, 10-SEA, 11-DEN, 12-PHI, 13-IND, 14-BAL, 15-DAL, 16-SD
| BET | BOA ODDS | VEGAS PAYOUT | % of BANKROLL | PAYOUT |
| 5 | 90.00% | 1.11 | 7.21% | 8.01 |
| 7 | 87.00% | 1.43 | 6.94% | 9.92 |
| 6 | 84.00% | 1.11 | 6.20% | 6.88 |
| 14 | 80.00% | 1.77 | 6.12% | 10.83 |
| 9 | 79.00% | 1.50 | 5.79% | 8.68 |
| 5,7 | 78.30% | 1.59 | 5.76% | 9.14 |
| 2 | 79.00% | 1.19 | 5.46% | 6.50 |
| 5,14 | 72.00% | 1.96 | 5.14% | 10.10 |
| 7,14 | 69.60% | 2.53 | 5.13% | 12.98 |
| 6,7 | 73.08% | 1.59 | 5.00% | 7.93 |
| 5,6 | 75.60% | 1.23 | 4.97% | 6.12 |
| 7,9 | 68.73% | 2.15 | 4.82% | 10.35 |
| 5,9 | 71.10% | 1.67 | 4.79% | 7.97 |
| 13 | 71.00% | 1.43 | 4.52% | 6.46 |
| 5,7,14 | 62.64% | 2.81 | 4.50% | 12.64 |
| 11 | 70.00% | 1.40 | 4.48% | 6.28 |
| 10 | 71.00% | 1.20 | 4.39% | 5.27 |
| 5,6,7 | 65.77% | 1.76 | 4.39% | 7.74 |
| 5,7,9 | 61.86% | 2.38 | 4.38% | 10.44 |
Alright, let's look at this. That table is based on a bankroll of $100. One of the other reasons BOA works is because it spreads risk over numerous bets in a way such that if one bet fails, other bets can still keep you afloat. If you don't feel like making 19 bets, my advice would be to scale the bets that you do make. If you only want to make the top 5 bets, for example, add the top 5 "% BANKROLLs" together. To find the new percentage to bet, divide that bet's "% BANKROLL" by the sum of the 5 "% BANKROLLs". So... 7.21+6.94+6.2+6.12+5.79 = 32.25. Bet 1 will be 7.21/32.25 = 22.36%. Bet 2 will be 6.94/32.35 = 21.51%, and so on. All 5 percentages should add up to 100%.
As you decrease the number of bets, you increase the amount of risk. For example, if you bet all 19 bets and and all teams win except 5-NE, which has a 90% confidence, you will lose 7.91% of your bankroll. If you decide to only bet the top 5 bets, you'll lose 22.36%. It's about all about your tolerance for risk, which is yours to figure out.
I hope this makes everyone happy. If not, send me some
Thursday, September 18, 2008
Bet Optimization Algorithm
The results for week 2 were none too impressive, but this makes my Bet Optimization Algorithm ("BOA") look much better. Simply put, BOA takes up to 21 individual bets, i.e. NYG win, MIA win, DAL win, MIN +3, etc., the payouts on those bets that Vegas offers, and the confidence NFLSim generates. Using the algorithms, BOA generates the optimal bets as well as what percentage of your bankroll you should wager on each bet. It spits out single bets and parlays of up to 6 teams. I didn't post the BOA's suggestions last week because I didn't want anyone relying on it, but I'll put them up for week 3. Keep in mind, it's still early in the season so things aren't as accurate as they could be, so be careful. Use at your own risk. Anyway, here's what it said to bet on last week. It generated a return on investment of 64% on the bets (all 31 of them). I'd say that's pretty successful.
To make it easier for me, I assign a number to each bet. All bets are on straight up winners on the moneyline, NO SPREAD. If there are numbers separated by a commas, those are parlays. All calculations are based on a total bankroll of $100. Makes calculations easier.
~"BOA ODDS" are BOA's calculated probability that the bet will win.
~"VEGAS PAYOUT" is the payout for that bet according to Vegas, in decimal form.
~"% OF BANKROLL" is the amount bankroll devoted to that bet.
~"POSSIBLE PAYOUT" is the amount won if the bet is won. (BANKROLL * % OF BANKROLL * VEGAS PAYOUT)
~"ACTUAL PAYOUT" is 0.00 if the bet loses or POSSIBLE PAYOUT if it wins.
1-BUF, 2-CHI, 3-DET, 4-MIN, 5-NO, 6-NYG, 7-KC, 8-TEN, 9-ATL, 10-SF, 11-BAL, 12-ARI, 13-NYJ, 14-DEN, 15-PIT, 16-PHI
Total Bankroll: $100
Total Winnings: $164.62
Total Profit: $64.62
Return on Investment: 64.62%
So even when the predictions aren't terribly accurate (53.3%), BOA is able to perform well based on the idea that the probabilities generated by NFLSim are equivalent to the probabilities in reality. Hopefully, for everyone, this will continue.
To make it easier for me, I assign a number to each bet. All bets are on straight up winners on the moneyline, NO SPREAD. If there are numbers separated by a commas, those are parlays. All calculations are based on a total bankroll of $100. Makes calculations easier.
~"BOA ODDS" are BOA's calculated probability that the bet will win.
~"VEGAS PAYOUT" is the payout for that bet according to Vegas, in decimal form.
~"% OF BANKROLL" is the amount bankroll devoted to that bet.
~"POSSIBLE PAYOUT" is the amount won if the bet is won. (BANKROLL * % OF BANKROLL * VEGAS PAYOUT)
~"ACTUAL PAYOUT" is 0.00 if the bet loses or POSSIBLE PAYOUT if it wins.
1-BUF, 2-CHI, 3-DET, 4-MIN, 5-NO, 6-NYG, 7-KC, 8-TEN, 9-ATL, 10-SF, 11-BAL, 12-ARI, 13-NYJ, 14-DEN, 15-PIT, 16-PHI
| BET | BOA ODDS | VEGAS PAYOUT | % OF BANKROLL | POSSIBLE PAYOUT | ACTUAL PAYOUT | |||
| 15 | 91.00% | 1.36 | 4.72% | 6.41 | 6.41 | |||
| 9 | 80.00% | 3.50 | 4.15% | 14.53 | 0.00 | |||
| 10 | 79.00% | 3.50 | 4.08% | 14.28 | 14.28 | |||
| 7 | 81.00% | 1.51 | 3.82% | 5.77 | 0.00 | |||
| 8 | 79.00% | 1.95 | 3.81% | 7.44 | 7.44 | |||
| 9,15 | 72.80% | 4.76 | 3.75% | 17.85 | 0.00 | |||
| 10,15 | 71.89% | 4.76 | 3.69% | 17.55 | 17.55 | |||
| 8,15 | 71.89% | 2.65 | 3.43% | 9.08 | 9.08 | |||
| 14 | 74.00% | 2.00 | 3.41% | 6.82 | 6.82 | |||
| 7,15 | 73.71% | 2.05 | 3.40% | 6.99 | 0.00 | |||
| 9,10 | 63.20% | 12.25 | 3.36% | 41.21 | 0.00 | |||
| 7,9 | 64.80% | 5.29 | 3.25% | 17.17 | 0.00 | |||
| 8,9 | 63.20% | 6.83 | 3.23% | 22.05 | 0.00 | |||
| 7,10 | 63.99% | 5.29 | 3.20% | 16.89 | 0.00 | |||
| 8,10 | 62.41% | 6.83 | 3.18% | 21.70 | 21.70 | |||
| 6 | 76.00% | 1.20 | 3.13% | 3.76 | 3.76 | |||
| 14,15 | 67.34% | 2.72 | 3.09% | 8.41 | 8.41 | |||
| 16 | 65.00% | 3.50 | 3.07% | 10.76 | 0.00 | |||
| 9,10,15 | 57.51% | 16.66 | 3.07% | 51.17 | 0.00 | |||
| 9,14 | 59.20% | 7.00 | 2.98% | 20.88 | 0.00 | |||
| 7,9,15 | 58.97% | 7.19 | 2.98% | 21.39 | 0.00 | |||
| 8,9,15 | 57.51% | 9.28 | 2.96% | 27.46 | 0.00 | |||
| 10,14 | 58.46% | 7.00 | 2.94% | 20.55 | 20.55 | |||
| 7,10,15 | 58.23% | 7.19 | 2.93% | 21.06 | 0.00 | |||
| 8,10,15 | 56.79% | 9.28 | 2.91% | 27.05 | 27.05 | |||
| 7,8 | 63.99% | 2.94 | 2.89% | 8.52 | 0.00 | |||
| 1 | 64.00% | 2.90 | 2.88% | 8.36 | 8.36 | |||
| 6,9 | 60.80% | 4.20 | 2.88% | 12.08 | 0.00 | |||
| 7,8,9,10,15 | 36.80% | 49.06 | 1.98% | 97.36 | 0.00 | |||
| 7,9,10,15 | 46.58% | 25.16 | 2.48% | 62.51 | 0.00 | |||
| 1,8 | 50.56% | 5.66 | 2.34% | 13.22 | 13.22 |
Total Bankroll: $100
Total Winnings: $164.62
Total Profit: $64.62
Return on Investment: 64.62%
So even when the predictions aren't terribly accurate (53.3%), BOA is able to perform well based on the idea that the probabilities generated by NFLSim are equivalent to the probabilities in reality. Hopefully, for everyone, this will continue.
Tuesday, February 5, 2008
Superbowl XLII Bets
Here are hypothetical bets that would have been placed on the Super Bowl. I've used alternative spreads in addition to the normal spread to add some extra betting opportunities. Also the weird bet amounts come from an algorithm I developed which is used to determine bet size based on predicted %, payout, and bankroll. Sometimes it even has you on both sides of a bet, hedging yourself. Very interesting... here they are: (also bet amounts are in terms of percentages of your bankroll)
In order of best bet to good bet, starting with single bets.
Over/Under:
Under 53.5: 82%
Payout: 1.91
Bet Amount: 12.98
Win: 24.80
Spreads:
NYG +17.5: 77%
Payout: 1.36
Bet Amount: 10.75
Win: 14.62
NYG +15.5: 72%
Payout: 1.5
Bet Amount: 9.54
Win: 14.31
NE Win: 67%
Payout: 1.24
Bet Amount: 7.87
Win: 9.76
NYG +11.5: 63%
Payout: 1.91
Bet Amount: 7.81
Win: 14.91
NYG +7.5: 54%
Payout: 2.4
Bet Amount: 6.23
Win: 14.96
NYG +5.5: 44%
Payout: 2.85
Bet Amount: 4.36
Win: 12.42
NE -5.5: 56%
Payout: 1.36
Bet Amount: 4.23
Win: 5.75
Parlays:
Under 53.5, NYG +17.5: 63%
Payout: 2.6
Bet Amount: 8.76
Win: 22.75
Under 53.5, NYG +15.5: 59%
Payout: 2.87
Bet Amount: 8.01
Win: 22.93
Under 53.5, NYG +11.5: 52%
Payout: 3.65
Bet Amount: 6.87
Win: 25.07
Under 53.5, NE Win: 56%
Payout: 2.37
Bet Amount: 6.84
Win: 16.21
Under 53.5, NYG +7.5: 44%
Payout: 4.58
Bet Amount: 5.75
Win: 26.35
Summary:
After looking at the different bets, it becomes clear that the most likely outcome of the game was a close, low scoring affair. While NE was still predicted to win, their slim margin of victory opened up a myriad of betting opportunities.
The numerical results:
Had you started the day off with $100, by the end of the day you'd have $193.12 and a smile on your face.
In order of best bet to good bet, starting with single bets.
Over/Under:
Under 53.5: 82%
Payout: 1.91
Bet Amount: 12.98
Win: 24.80
Spreads:
NYG +17.5: 77%
Payout: 1.36
Bet Amount: 10.75
Win: 14.62
NYG +15.5: 72%
Payout: 1.5
Bet Amount: 9.54
Win: 14.31
NE Win: 67%
Payout: 1.24
Bet Amount: 7.87
Win: 9.76
NYG +11.5: 63%
Payout: 1.91
Bet Amount: 7.81
Win: 14.91
NYG +7.5: 54%
Payout: 2.4
Bet Amount: 6.23
Win: 14.96
NYG +5.5: 44%
Payout: 2.85
Bet Amount: 4.36
Win: 12.42
NE -5.5: 56%
Payout: 1.36
Bet Amount: 4.23
Win: 5.75
Parlays:
Under 53.5, NYG +17.5: 63%
Payout: 2.6
Bet Amount: 8.76
Win: 22.75
Under 53.5, NYG +15.5: 59%
Payout: 2.87
Bet Amount: 8.01
Win: 22.93
Under 53.5, NYG +11.5: 52%
Payout: 3.65
Bet Amount: 6.87
Win: 25.07
Under 53.5, NE Win: 56%
Payout: 2.37
Bet Amount: 6.84
Win: 16.21
Under 53.5, NYG +7.5: 44%
Payout: 4.58
Bet Amount: 5.75
Win: 26.35
Summary:
After looking at the different bets, it becomes clear that the most likely outcome of the game was a close, low scoring affair. While NE was still predicted to win, their slim margin of victory opened up a myriad of betting opportunities.
The numerical results:
Had you started the day off with $100, by the end of the day you'd have $193.12 and a smile on your face.
Labels:
Betting,
Gambling,
Handicapping,
NE,
NYG,
Sports Interaction,
Super Bowl,
XLII
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)